W dniu 23.10.2012 22:24, RW pisze: Hi,
> On reading you your question more thoroughly I see that your main > point was that you aren't getting as many processes as expected. > > The number of child processes isn't adjusted immediately, it's > incremented or decremented when a child announces that it is idle. > Testing with only six calls isn't enough to expect sensible results. > > What you need to do is hammer spamd with lots more spamc calls and > watch the number of child processes evolve in real time - maybe have > the background processes log the child count as each spamc process > completes. Indeed, I've flooded spamd with many connections. In results I got as much spamd processess as I defined using "-m" option. Thanks for tip, now all is clear for me. Regards, Marcin
