RE: 0 Hits on blatant spam

2005-04-15 Thread Gray, Richard
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Wesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 April 2005 20:18 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: 0 Hits on blatant spam > > > http://www.timuel.com/badmessage.txt > We have quite a strict filtering setup for p

Re: 0 Hits on blatant spam

2005-04-15 Thread John Wilcock
Jeff Chan wrote: The spam advertises a presumptive porn site on geocities. Yep - I've been seeing a lot of those too (and forwarding them to abuse@ geocities.com). Luckily the spammers have been consistent (at least so far) in how they name the sites, so the rule below does the trick... uri lo

Re: 0 Hits on blatant spam

2005-04-15 Thread Jeff Chan
On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 12:17:31 PM, Tim Wesemann wrote: > I've been getting alot of leak-through with 3.02 lately and I thought > this one was interesting, particularly that there are plenty of rules that > look for a certain word that rhymes with "truck" (YKWIM), but no header > rules that l

Re: 0 Hits on blatant spam

2005-04-14 Thread Matt Kettler
Tim Wesemann wrote: > I've been getting alot of leak-through with 3.02 lately and I thought > this one was interesting, particularly that there are plenty of rules > that > look for a certain word that rhymes with "truck" (YKWIM), but no header > rules that look for the word with an "ing" on the e

0 Hits on blatant spam

2005-04-14 Thread Tim Wesemann
I've been getting alot of leak-through with 3.02 lately and I thought this one was interesting, particularly that there are plenty of rules that look for a certain word that rhymes with "truck" (YKWIM), but no header rules that look for the word with an "ing" on the end of it. I only see one body r