On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:39:46AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> thanks. I understand this
> - was only a "labelling" problem
> - has been fixed in 3.0.4.
Yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
No, I do not know what the Schadenfreude is. Please tell me, because
I'm dying to know.
--
In an older episode (Wednesday 08 June 2005 00:54), Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:50:59AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> Per the Changes file, the full information is in Bugzilla bug 4367:
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4367
>
> The short version is that the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:50:59AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> sorry, not being an native english speaker, Isimply don't understand what
> this
> is about, could someone re-phrase that?
Per the Changes file, the full information is in Bugzilla bug 4367:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cg
In an older episode (Tuesday 07 June 2005 22:17), Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:13:48PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote:
> > I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
> > RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
> > played so
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:13:48PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote:
> I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
> RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
> played some musical chairs or am I not seeing this correctly?
Yes, they did. The SORBS r
Hi,
I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
played some musical chairs or am I not seeing this correctly?
Pete
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -u Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.3/rules/50_scores.cf
Mail-SpamAs
