Nate Schindler wrote:
> awesome! looks like it removes addresses seen only once.
By design. I figured that the addresses with single entries were the
ones most likely to be spam... and so the ones least usefully kept in
the AWL. In one extreme case IIRC it dropped the AWL file from ~5M to
~80K
awesome! looks like it removes addresses seen only once. it also seems to be
okay with SA 3.0.
Thanks much! (Kris, too:)
-Original Message-
From: snowjack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:21 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL auto_expire
Nate Schindler wrote:
Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned
feature?
My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll
become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
...or is there already some way to expire old entries from the AWL,
Title: AWL auto_expire?
Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned feature?
My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
...or is there already some way to expire old en
