Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Every email that comes in postfix i send to that filter, and this filter send the email. When i use the with the option -u ${recipient} it override the user that is runing and do the process with the user that is reciving the email, when it autolearn it goes to a diferent user in the table. So i

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread LuKreme
On 4-Mar-2010, at 07:45, Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > I have set up my spamassassin to traing individual database (mysql ) with > this filter in postfix > > spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe >flags=Rq user=spamassassin argv=/usr/bin/spamc -u ${recipient} -f -e

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
Right. Henrique Fernandes wrote: > It was wht i asked, sorry i am not fluent in english > > It is the score that the bayes add to the final scores right ? > > > []'sf.rique > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bowie Bailey > wrote: > > Henrique Fernandes wrote: >

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Henrique Fernandes
It was wht i asked, sorry i am not fluent in english It is the score that the bayes add to the final scores right ? []'sf.rique On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > I will discuss here and find out with one is better. > > > > Wha

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
Henrique Fernandes wrote: > Thanks! > > I will discuss here and find out with one is better. > > What are the weight of the bayser score after they well trained ? Have > any ideas about it ? I'm not sure what you are asking. What do you mean by "weight"? The default scores (as of 3.2.5) are: BA

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Thanks! I will discuss here and find out with one is better. What are the weight of the bayser score after they well trained ? Have any ideas about it ? []'sf.rique On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > (Please send replies to the list) > > Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > > > O

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
(Please send replies to the list) Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Bowie Bailey > wrote: > > Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > Nops, i wnat that after i trained, the same email, should get a > higher > > score cause the spamass

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
Henrique Fernandes wrote: > Nops, i wnat that after i trained, the same email, should get a higher > score cause the spamassassin was trained that is a spam, so when it > comes again , it should look in the database and add some extra point > on the score right ? That is a fairly common misconcept

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Nops, i wnat that after i trained, the same email, should get a higher score cause the spamassassin was trained that is a spam, so when it comes again , it should look in the database and add some extra point on the score right ? []'sf.rique On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:

Re: About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Henrique Fernandes wrote on Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:45:38 -0300: > But if i send the same email that was autolearned it does not get an higher > score.. it should be lik eit or it shoul get higher ? I if understand you correctly you want to learn a message twice. sa-learn won't do this. And the docs

About Training ( sa-learn )

2010-03-04 Thread Henrique Fernandes
I have set up my spamassassin to traing individual database (mysql ) with this filter in postfix spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq user=spamassassin argv=/usr/bin/spamc -u ${recipient} -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} -- ${recipient} as