> >
> >While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore doing
> it with minimal fuss in SAm or if a FILTER or MILTER might be required.
> >
> >So far I've only found "Basic Message Tagging Options".
>
> this is not a job for SpamAssassin.
>
> Perhaps a milter application could
Hello,
On 14.02.22 12:31, joea- lists wrote:
Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without same.
While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore doing it
with minimal fuss in SAm or if a FILTER or MILTER might be required.
So far I've only found
On 2/14/22 1:18 PM, joea- lists wrote:
The reason has to do with "reply" and "reply to all" with the email
client/system I am using and prefer to continue using for now.
To each their own.
Being subscribed to several lists, I find some variation between them
regarding the headers they
* joea:
> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without
> same.
Assuming you are the message sender, that's a task best left to your
MUA. I don't known if GroupWise can do it, though. Beyond that, using
Postfix is a better option for adding custom headers than trying to
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, joea- lists wrote:
The reason has to do with "reply" and "reply to all" with the email
client/system I am using and prefer to continue using for now.
Being subscribed to several lists, I find some variation between them
regarding the headers they provide and how my "reply"
>>>
> On 2022‑02‑14 at 12:31:18 UTC‑0500 (Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:31:18 ‑0500)
> joea‑ lists
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply‑to: (some address)" to messages
without
>> same.
>>
>> While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore
>> doing it with
>>>
> "joea‑ lists" writes:
>
>> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply‑to: (some address)" to messages
without same.
>
>
> Please do explain why. It sounds like a clear standards violation
> because Reply‑To may only be set by the sender.
>
>> While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I
On 2022-02-14 at 12:31:18 UTC-0500 (Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:31:18 -0500)
joea- lists
is rumored to have said:
Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without
same.
While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore
doing it with minimal fuss in SAm or if a
"joea- lists" writes:
> Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without same.
Please do explain why. It sounds like a clear standards violation
because Reply-To may only be set by the sender.
> While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore
>
Nutshell: I want to add "Reply-to: (some address)" to messages without same.
While it seems feasible to do this in postfix, I wanted to explore doing it
with minimal fuss in SAm or if a FILTER or MILTER might be required.
So far I've only found "Basic Message Tagging Options".
joe a.
10 matches
Mail list logo
