On 16.05.13 19:32, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
I shall have Bayes forget emails, then retrain with a rule that counts
linkedin invitations as spam. I have one I wrote earlier and implemented
after Bayes had gone off track.
You don't have to forget mail, unless you have feed incorrectly formatted
m
Thank-you everyone.
I shall have Bayes forget emails, then retrain with a rule that counts linkedin
invitations as spam. I have one I wrote earlier and implemented after Bayes had
gone off track.
Cheers, S.
--
as silly as fun
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org / .net
pgp 4BA78604
Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:07:53 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Simon Loewenthal skrev den 2013-05-16 15:17:
>
> > * have sa-learn exclude references to linkedin?
>
> basicly you need to know how bayes works, it does not just use the
> word linkedin as writed, but more or less split it to each letter
Simon Loewenthal skrev den 2013-05-16 15:17:
* have sa-learn exclude references to linkedin?
basicly you need to know how bayes works, it does not just use the word
linkedin as writed, but more or less split it to each letter, so
linkedin and other content is splited into atoms that being st
On 16.05.13 15:17, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that LinkedIn
invitation emails hit BAYES_00. A bit strange I thought being unlikely
someone had run sa-learn on LinkedIn emails.
I grepped on all the Ham and Spam directories and hit lots of
On 2013-05-16 16:17, RW wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:14 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi all, I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed
that LinkedIn invitation emails hit BAYES_00.
When you say email, I presume you mean spam.
Yep
A bit strange I thought being unl
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:14 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that
> LinkedIn
> invitation emails hit BAYES_00.
When you say email, I presume you mean spam.
> A bit strange I thought being
> unlikely someone had run sa-
Hi all,
I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that
LinkedIn
invitation emails hit BAYES_00. A bit strange I thought being
unlikely someone had run sa-learn on LinkedIn emails.
I grepped on all the Ham and Spam directories and hit lots of
"linkedin,com" in URLs in the bod