On 18-May-2009, at 18:45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Now, what's the proper term for archive in "forum" context
rather than mailing lists...?
Lame? :D
--
Nothing gold can stay -- Robert Frost
Stay gold -- Johnny Cade
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 17:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
>
> > 2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing:
> > Content-Type: image/png;)
>
> That's a little harsh by itself.
Agreed, definitely. Makes one wonder if he knows
On Mon, 18 May 2009, fatuglymoomoo wrote:
2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing:
Content-Type: image/png;)
That's a little harsh by itself.
conclusion:- i think emails with only a PNG are 99.999% spam
We agree, and we've posted some rules that check for that.
It
-and-spamassassin-say-its-HAM-%3Cargh%3E-tp23325198p23607351.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 2009-05-02 19:41:23, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> next create clamav sigs :)
Currently I have over 23000 original viriis and the shit coming in are
only copies of them... So collecting more viriis is is boring... :-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Tamay Dogan
On Fri, May 1, 2009 19:34, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> This rule has already collected over 480 MByte...
next create clamav sigs :)
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
Hi Bob,
Am 2009-04-30 21:41:30, schrieb Bob Proulx:
> I was about to write the list and ask if there is a rule that could be
> triggered when a message no only an image part but no text parts. I
> have no idea how to create it but that would be very useful for me and
> this type of spam. As far
Dave Funk wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> I was about to write the list and ask if there is a rule that could be
>> triggered when a message [contains] only an image part but no text parts.
> There should already be rules for that exact format.
Which rules? I see no rule hits here.
I see that I c
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Bob Proulx wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG
spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham.
I have been getting pummeled by the image only spam messages too.
Does someone know HO
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG
> spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham.
I have been getting pummeled by the image only spam messages too.
> Does someone know HOW to reject this crap eectively?
I
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend)
PNG spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham.
Check the list archives for today, there's been some discussion of
detecting them via ImageInfo.
--
John H
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Does someone know HOW to reject this crap eectively?
SpamAssassin does not reject mail. But with the clamav plugin and the
3rd party clamav signatures from sanesecurity.com, it detects them
pretty well here.
Hope this helps,
wolfgang
Hello Geeks,
I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG
spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham.
This becomes now annoying because they are actualy over 6 GByte and I
can catch thenm only in a procmail recipe when it is to late to reject
13 matches
Mail list logo
