From: "Chris Purves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The attached newsletter is triggering the following rules:
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.6 SARE_BAYES_5x7 BODY: Bayes poison 5x7
* 0.8 SARE_BAYES_7x7 BODY: Bayes poison 7x7
* 0.6 SARE_BAYES_6x7 BODY: Bayes poison 6x7
* 1.4 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is
You're lucky it scored that low. Most of these airline things come in at
aronud 40 points on my system, they have such bad HTML formatting.
The BAYES_x_y rules are looking for a pattern of y-letter words repeated at
least x times. This is virtually impossible in any human language that
isn't enc
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 2:37:47 AM, you wrote:
CP> The attached newsletter is triggering the following rules:
CP> X-Spam-Report:
CP> * 0.6 SARE_BAYES_5x7 BODY: Bayes poison 5x7
CP> * 0.8 SARE_BAYES_7x7 BODY: Bayes poison 7x7
CP> * 0.6 SARE_BAYES_6x7 BODY: Bayes pois
jdow wrote:
>
> Don't know about those scores. But it mentions doubleclick, which
> SHOULD score a solid 10 in any SA rule set.
Unless the administrator involved actually has any users who want
commercial mail of any sort.
As much as I despise doubleclick, they are unfortunately commonly used
on *
Loren Wilton wrote:
The other rule is looking for a really standard spammer trick:
.
Interesting. How is this helpful to spammers?
--
Good day, eh.
Chris
Chris Purves wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
The other rule is looking for a really standard spammer trick:
.
Interesting. How is this helpful to spammers?
Indeed. This used to crop up regularly in MS-Frontpage circa 1998 when
people added and then removed markup. Dunno if that is still the ca
