On 2:59 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some constant spamming
from dot info domains. Perhaps for the past 2 months or so.
Often they send hundreds per day
On 10/14/2010 8:26 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Jason Bertochja...@i6ix.com wrote:
On 2:59 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some
Hello Julian Yap,
Am 2010-10-12 10:32:39, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some constant spamming
from dot info domains. Perhaps for the past 2
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some constant spamming
from dot info domains. Perhaps for the past 2 months or so.
Often they send hundreds per day and consistently from the same
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some constant spamming
from dot info domains. Perhaps for the past 2 months or so.
Often
: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2010 10:05 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Constant .info domain spam
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my
.
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2010 10:05 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Constant .info domain spam
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains
I confirm that on revisiting, RCVD_IN_* rules are implemented - thanks for your
help
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2010 11:41 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Constant .info domain spam
2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
NOTE: I changed the domains below to 'dot info' as the mailing list
rejected my initial submission.
I'm pretty sure it's not just me but there is some constant spamming
from dot info
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Constant .info domain spam
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 11:16 +1300, Peter Lowish wrote:
How are RCVD_IN_* rules implemented Karsten?
They are generally DNS BL checks, some of which do (and are safe for)
deep header parsing. Most of them are checked against
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:03 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
Doh! Upon re-reading, I just realized that you are the OP of this
thread, not Peter. So, please, Julian, think of most (if not all)
2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:03 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:32 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
Are people using automated IP blacklists or something like that?
Yes.
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:22 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:03 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
Many of the don't trigger the RCVD_IN_* rules. Does anyone implement
their own private DNS black list?
Many of what?
Many
On 10/12/2010 8:14 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[Added after re-reading: Same request. Which ones do hit, optionaly
which ones don't?]
For the IPs mentioned:
217.23.6.209
204.45.150.196
64.32.6.4
173.234.224.131
184.107.29.11
72.55.165.139
67.159.50.131
174.37.134.225
...here is a tally of
14 matches
Mail list logo
