Re: DCC license

2021-04-22 Thread Steve Dondley
The DCC FAQ at https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/FAQ.html#license describes the definitive ways to get any questions answered regarding DCC licensing. Any answers you could get here would be conjecture and anecdote. I found a form on their website for licensing questions. Waiting to hear back.

Re: DCC license

2021-04-22 Thread Bill Cole
On 22 Apr 2021, at 9:20, Steve Dondley wrote: Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. More than a bit. DCC is not owned, released, or bundled by the ASF SpamAssassin Project or any other part of the ASF. The SpamAssassin project doesn't have any control over DCC licensing or any particular expert

Re: DCC license

2021-04-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.04.21 09:20, Steve Dondley wrote: Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. I'm looking into installing DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearninghouse) software. DCC has it's own users list. I don't see anything in there about disallowing usage of the software by "managed mail services." there's

DCC license

2021-04-22 Thread Steve Dondley
Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. I'm looking into installing DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearninghouse) software. The page at https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/INSTALL.html says: "The free license is intended to cover individuals and organizations including Internet service providers using DCC

RE: DCC License Change

2005-03-20 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: zondag 20 maart 2005 5:18 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: DCC License Change > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote: > > > I read

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote: > > I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like > > DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely > > removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentally get in a > > lic

RE: DCC License Change

2005-03-20 Thread Greg Allen
ll it on my gateway today. :-) -Original Message- From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:36 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: DCC License Change Matt Kettler wrote: > Justin Mason wrote: > >Well, I guess this gives us a go

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-20 Thread Eric A. Hall
Greg Allen wrote: > I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like > DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely > removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentally get in a > license/legal dispute without their knowledge. Seems

RE: DCC License Change

2005-03-20 Thread Rose, Bobby
ch 19, 2005 2:43 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: DCC License Change I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentall

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-19 Thread Bob Proulx
Matt Kettler wrote: > Justin Mason wrote: > >Well, I guess this gives us a good reason to finally get around to > >writing our own hashing subsystem... > > Unfortunately that might not be a workable option Justin. The reason DCC > is changing license is because it's infringing on a broad patent o

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-18 Thread Matt Kettler
Justin Mason wrote: Well, I guess this gives us a good reason to finally get around to writing our own hashing subsystem... - --j. Unfortunately that might not be a workable option Justin. The reason DCC is changing license is because it's infringing on a broad patent of using hashes to automatic

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-18 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:54:26AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > >imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the > > >licensing change? > > > > Basically the primary target is those specifically sell

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-18 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:54:26AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > >imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the > >licensing change? > > Basically the primary target is those specifically selling managed > services and appliances. This was the first I've heard of a licens

Re: DCC License Change

2005-03-18 Thread Matt Kettler
Thomas Cameron wrote: Has anyone been following the DCC license change thread on the DCC mailing list? Is anyone going to be negatively affected by it? I run a small mail server for my own small business, so I don't imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions o

DCC License Change

2005-03-18 Thread Thomas Cameron
Has anyone been following the DCC license change thread on the DCC mailing list? Is anyone going to be negatively affected by it? I run a small mail server for my own small business, so I don't imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the licensing change? Thomas