Re: DKIM domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"

2016-08-26 Thread Dave Warren
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 08:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 8/26/2016 11:34 AM, widowsoft wrote: > > I am sure this has been done to death but I would like to ban emails that > > show > > "domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"" > > > > any ideas please I have tried re

Re: DKIM domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"

2016-08-26 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 8/26/2016 11:34 AM, widowsoft wrote: I am sure this has been done to death but I would like to ban emails that show "domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"" any ideas please I have tried regex but i admit i am a novice i added header DKIM_FAIL ALL =~ /domaink

DKIM domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"

2016-08-26 Thread widowsoft
024-bit key)/i score DKIM_FAIL 4 can a guru help please -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/DKIM-domainkeys-fail-1024-bit-key-reason-fail-message-has-been-altered-tp122324.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-12 Thread Terry Soucy
Heya, We leave the score at 0.00 and use it in a test for Yahoo, since there is a lot of valid Yahoo messages getting tagged because of the RFC Ignorant rules. We check for it coming from a Yahoo server, and then test for DK_VERIFIED. If both are correct, then we apply a -3.00 to the score to c

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-12 Thread Justin Mason
Mark Martinec writes: > Alexis, > > > I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the > > default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because > > they're still a bit experimental. > > > > Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these > > pl

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-11 Thread Alexis Manning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > [...] some mailing list also corrupt signatures, > and some people use gmail/yahoo sending address even when posting > through some other ISP. Before this practice is rooted out, > one should probably not score invalid signature from these > two domains too harshly. Tha

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-11 Thread Mark Martinec
Alexis, > I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the > default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because > they're still a bit experimental. > > Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these > plugins, or are these really just too unr

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-11 Thread Alexis Manning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > Alexis Manning wrote: [DK/DKIM plugins] > > Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these > > plugins, or are these really just too unripe for serious use at the > > moment? > > Why don't you keep an eye on the activity for those scores and then de

Re: DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-11 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
Alexis Manning wrote: I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because they're still a bit experimental. Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these plugins, or are these really just

DKIM / DomainKeys

2007-02-11 Thread Alexis Manning
I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because they're still a bit experimental. Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these plugins, or are these really just too unripe for serious u