On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 08:39, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/26/2016 11:34 AM, widowsoft wrote:
> > I am sure this has been done to death but I would like to ban emails that
> > show
> > "domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)""
> >
> > any ideas please I have tried re
On 8/26/2016 11:34 AM, widowsoft wrote:
I am sure this has been done to death but I would like to ban emails that
show
"domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)""
any ideas please I have tried regex but i admit i am a novice
i added
header DKIM_FAIL ALL =~ /domaink
024-bit key)/i
score DKIM_FAIL 4
can a guru help please
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/DKIM-domainkeys-fail-1024-bit-key-reason-fail-message-has-been-altered-tp122324.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Heya,
We leave the score at 0.00 and use it in a test for Yahoo, since there
is a lot of valid Yahoo messages getting tagged because of the RFC
Ignorant rules. We check for it coming from a Yahoo server, and then
test for DK_VERIFIED. If both are correct, then we apply a -3.00 to the
score to c
Mark Martinec writes:
> Alexis,
>
> > I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the
> > default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because
> > they're still a bit experimental.
> >
> > Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these
> > pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> [...] some mailing list also corrupt signatures,
> and some people use gmail/yahoo sending address even when posting
> through some other ISP. Before this practice is rooted out,
> one should probably not score invalid signature from these
> two domains too harshly.
Tha
Alexis,
> I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the
> default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because
> they're still a bit experimental.
>
> Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these
> plugins, or are these really just too unr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Alexis Manning wrote:
[DK/DKIM plugins]
> > Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these
> > plugins, or are these really just too unripe for serious use at the
> > moment?
>
> Why don't you keep an eye on the activity for those scores and then de
Alexis Manning wrote:
I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the
default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because
they're still a bit experimental.
Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these
plugins, or are these really just
I enabled the DK/DKIM plugins in my SA 3.1.7 setup and I see that the
default scores for their tests are negligible, presumably because
they're still a bit experimental.
Is anyone using these and can suggest appropriate scores for these
plugins, or are these really just too unripe for serious u
10 matches
Mail list logo