"I didn't change anything"(tm) :-)
If I did, I don't think it should have done anything to dkim signatures,
but I will doublecheck rewrite rules.
I have upgraded from Mail-DKIM .31 to .32 to see if it helps.
Anyone else missing the DKIM_VERIFIED rule on legit email?
any reason .31 started to f
On 9/4/08 at 9:10 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
>Anyone else missing the DKIM_VERIFIED rule on legit email?
Out of the last 249,000 emails, DKIM_VERIFIED has only hit 18 times.
DKIM_SIGNED on the other hand has hit about 58,000 times.
Nedry
> On 9/4/08 at 9:10 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> Anyone else missing the DKIM_VERIFIED rule on legit email?
>
> Out of the last 249,000 emails, DKIM_VERIFIED has only hit 18 times.
> DKIM_SIGNED on the other hand has hit about 58,000 times.
>
> Nedry
>
All legit email?
Something has happ
Larry Nedry,
> Out of the last 249,000 emails, DKIM_VERIFIED has only hit 18 times.
> DKIM_SIGNED on the other hand has hit about 58,000 times.
This is highly unusual, my stats show that overall 80% of messages
with a DKIM or DK signature bear a valid signature, and 20% fail
validation. (checking
