Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-05-01 Thread Bill Cole
If you're going to engage with RH, leave me out of it. On 2023-05-01 at 11:14:12 UTC-0400 (Mon, 1 May 2023 09:14:12 -0600) Philip Prindeville is rumored to have said: On May 1, 2023, at 3:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.04.23 um 20:54 schrieb Philip Prindeville: On Apr 28, 2023, at

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-05-01 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On May 1, 2023, at 3:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 30.04.23 um 20:54 schrieb Philip Prindeville: >>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 12:17 PM, Philip Prindeville >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.04.23 um 18:11

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-30 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 12:17 PM, Philip Prindeville > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 28.04.23 um 18:11 schrieb Philip Prindeville: On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole wrote: On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-28 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 28.04.23 um 18:11 schrieb Philip Prindeville: >>> On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600) >>> Philip Prindeville >>> is rumored to have

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-28 Thread Bill Cole
On 2023-04-28 at 12:11:02 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:11:02 -0600) Philip Prindeville is rumored to have said: On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole wrote: On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600) Philip Prindeville is rumored to have said: I thought the

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-28 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600) > Philip Prindeville > is rumored to have said: > >> I thought the matching included subdomains, and seem to remember that >> working. > > It never has. At least not

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-25 Thread Bill Cole
On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600) Philip Prindeville is rumored to have said: I thought the matching included subdomains, and seem to remember that working. It never has. At least not in the past 17 years. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Hi Philip, To my knowledge, the matching is a simple glob which does NOT work on subdomains. You might be able to do *@*.ceipalmm.com and *@ceipalmm.com Regards, KAM On 4/24/2023 4:34 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Oh, and this is on Fedora, so I'm running 3.4.6... On Apr 24, 2023, at

Re: Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-24 Thread Philip Prindeville
Oh, and this is on Fedora, so I'm running 3.4.6... > On Apr 24, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Philip Prindeville > wrote: > > Hi, > > I have the following line: > > whitelist_from_rcvd *@ceipalmm.com mailgun.net > > And tried it on a message that had: > > Return-Path: > > But it didn't get

Did the whitelist_from_rcvd semantics change?

2023-04-24 Thread Philip Prindeville
Hi, I have the following line: whitelist_from_rcvd *@ceipalmm.com mailgun.net And tried it on a message that had: Return-Path: But it didn't get whitelisted. If I change the pattern above to "*@mg2.ceipalmm.com" it works. I thought the matching included subdomains, and seem to