On 2021-10-09 19:52, Thomas Seilund wrote:
I will look into upgrading and the suggestions you put forward.
also amavisd does not need spamd, if that part of diffent test
Authentication-Results: spamproc1-he-de.apache.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netmaster.dk he
On 10/9/21 7:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2021-10-09 at 11:39:48 UTC-0400 (Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:39:48 +0200)
Thomas Seilund
is rumored to have said:
Mail server is Debian Buster running Postfix and SA 3.4.2.
On 09.10.21 12:54, Bill Cole wrote:
You should upgrade SA. The current rel
On 10/9/21 6:54 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2021-10-09 at 11:39:48 UTC-0400 (Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:39:48 +0200)
Thomas Seilund
is rumored to have said:
Dear All
I see incomming mail that I would imagine that SA should classify as
spam but mail only gets a score of 2
When I run the same mail thr
On 10/9/21 5:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.10.21 um 17:39 schrieb Thomas Seilund:
Dear All
I see incomming mail that I would imagine that SA should classify as
spam but mail only gets a score of 2
When I run the same mail through spamc from the command line the
score is 11.8.
Why
On 2021-10-09 at 11:39:48 UTC-0400 (Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:39:48 +0200)
Thomas Seilund
is rumored to have said:
Mail server is Debian Buster running Postfix and SA 3.4.2.
On 09.10.21 12:54, Bill Cole wrote:
You should upgrade SA. The current release is 3.4.6 and it includes
significant performanc
On 2021-10-09 at 11:39:48 UTC-0400 (Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:39:48 +0200)
Thomas Seilund
is rumored to have said:
Dear All
I see incomming mail that I would imagine that SA should classify as
spam but mail only gets a score of 2
When I run the same mail through spamc from the command line the sco
On 2021-10-09 17:39, Thomas Seilund wrote:
sudo cat
/srv/vmail/netmaster.dk/tps/mail/cur/1633788457.M618066P6142.linode2.netmaster.dk,S=5989,W=6185:2,Sc
| spamc -R
11.8/5.0
if that works you are ready for using fuglu
eq example here shows that spamd works with your dns setup
have you overrid
Dear All
I see incomming mail that I would imagine that SA should classify as
spam but mail only gets a score of 2
When I run the same mail through spamc from the command line the score
is 11.8.
Why is the score not 11.8 when the mail is handled by Postfix/SA?
Pls. see details below.
Mail
On 2021-10-08 13:32, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Thomas, needing to lower your score to two or three implies To me
that your system could use some tweaking. In particular I would guess
that your Bayesian tokens need to be cleared.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
On 2021-10-08 13:24, Thomas Seilund wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.4 required=5.0
tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESS
Hi Thomas, needing to lower your score to two or three implies To me that
your system could use some tweaking. In particular I would guess that your
Bayesian tokens need to be cleared.
As for the different scores, you would have to know the way that
spamassassin is being used on your system.
For
Dear all
If I look at the score reported from within my mail client Thunderbird I
see this section:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLACK
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
If I run th
12 matches
Mail list logo
