On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 01:34 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RDNS_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
> >
> > INVALID_DATE is the rule triggered here, but not above. The overall
> > score difference of ~1.6 matches this rule's sc
o.
Basically what we do is run SA over html templates to score them on their
spammyness for want of a better word.
Both of the examples are run on the same template but from different apps
(websites) written in different languages.
>From what you say it looks like the .NET app is having trouble with the
dates so I can pass this back to the person that coded it.
Thanks again
Justin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Differing-results-from-same-email-tp30230681p30236567.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:51 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> This is the first time I have used this software so sorry if it's a stupid
> question but SpamAssassin is giving us differing results on the same email
> when they are run on different websites.
Some of this is quite confusing.
.NET one is always higher.
Any help would be extremely welcome.
Cheers
Justin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Differing-results-from-same-email-tp30230681p30230681.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
