John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to Trust at the least. I mean do I put
my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to Trust at the least. I mean do I
put
my ISP in my
Matthias Leisi wrote:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
the number of DNS lookups and can
Linda Walsh schrieb am 12.06.2008 02:46:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
How does one decided on 'trust'?
For trusted_network in SpamAssassin, the
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to Trust at the least. I mean do I put
my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with
It could be
Linda Walsh wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
the number of DNS
At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
Probability of what, exactly?
It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an
arbitrary score.
Bear in mind, trusted means does not forge Received: headers,
not does not send or relay spam.
My answer was more about levels of
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
Probability of what, exactly?
It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an
arbitrary score.
That's not the what that you're measuring with the probability factor,
that's the how you're
Hi John,
At 13:07 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
That's not the what that you're measuring with the probability
factor, that's the how you're measuring it.
Right. It's been a long day. I'll refrain from elaborating or else
I'll say another blunder. :-)
Was the OP _not_ talking about trust
Matthias Leisi wrote:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
the number of DNS lookups and can avoid
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to Trust at the least. I mean do I put
my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with
It could be a reputation system where you
11 matches
Mail list logo
