...
Subject: Excessive DNS Requests
From: lister lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 08:41:38 2005
To: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Excessive DNS Requests
...
From: Nix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
...
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:41:22 +
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, List Mail User
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, List Mail User stipulated:
2) If you do mone than 10K messages a day, make your server stub
the roots of the bl domains.
I'd be amazed if this was useful: if you're querying them, your nameserver
should have queried them and cached them as a side-effect of
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a bunch of
the BL checks to 0.0 to turn off the rules. Any idea how to further
prevent
lister lynch wrote:
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a bunch of
the BL checks to 0.0 to turn off the rules. Any idea how
lister lynch wrote:
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a bunch of
the BL checks to 0.0 to turn off the rules. Any idea how
lister lynch wrote:
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a bunch of
the BL checks to 0.0 to turn off the rules. Any idea how
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:49:01 -0500, lister lynch wrote
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily
due to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a
bunch of the BL checks to 0.0
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:49:24PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:49:01 -0500, lister lynch wrote
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily
due to SA, I think. Looked around
lister lynch wrote:
Our ISP, Covad, is periodically claiming that we have excessive DNS
requests and is threatening to turn off our service. It's primarily due
to SA, I think. Looked around for answers, and already set a bunch of
the BL checks to 0.0 to turn off the rules. Any idea how
Kelson wrote:
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:49:24PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
I can't give you specific instructions for FC1, but I know older
versions of
RedHat had a package specifically for this, all preconfigured.
I think it was pdnsd, but it appears not to be in the FC
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 17:25, Kelson wrote:
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:49:24PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
I can't give you specific instructions for FC1, but I know older versions of
RedHat had a package specifically for this, all preconfigured.
I think it was
lister lynch wrote:
I checked the PDC of the domain (W2003), and it was running DNS for
forward and reverse lookup zones, as well as caching lookup. There
shouldn't be any problem installing caching-nameserver on the FC box as
well, should there?
No, but why not just make the FC box use the PDC
David Brodbeck wrote:
lister lynch wrote:
I checked the PDC of the domain (W2003), and it was running DNS for
forward and reverse lookup zones, as well as caching lookup. There
shouldn't be any problem installing caching-nameserver on the FC box
as well, should there?
No, but why not just
14 matches
Mail list logo
