On 2/21/2018 11:44 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:35:27 +
Karol Augustin wrote:
I think the point here might be that if Google acted promptly on abuse
spammers would stop using shorteners.
True, that might happen. OTOH, I see about as many spams with
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:35:27 +
Karol Augustin wrote:
> I think the point here might be that if Google acted promptly on abuse
> spammers would stop using shorteners.
True, that might happen. OTOH, I see about as many spams with bit.ly
shorteners as goo.gl shorteners
On 2018-02-21 16:31, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:29:00 -0500
> Rob McEwen wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, it is a shame to have to shift more of the burden onto
>> spam filters to do more work (some of which requires MORE latency) -
>> in order to partly mitigate
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:29:00 -0500
Rob McEwen wrote:
> Nevertheless, it is a shame to have to shift more of the burden onto
> spam filters to do more work (some of which requires MORE latency) -
> in order to partly mitigate Google's failure to prevent/correct the
> abuse.
On 2/21/2018 11:11 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
I guess I misinterpreted: "...such automated lookups could also put a
huge extra burden on Google's servers..." from Message-Id
Oh yeah, I'd forgotten about that part. it was a more minor point.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:58:17 -0500
Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 2/21/2018 10:37 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > The concern voiced in another email about overloading Google's
> > infrastructure is quite charming and quaint.
> My concern was NEVER about overloading google.
I guess
On 2/21/2018 10:37 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
The concern voiced in another email about overloading Google's
infrastructure is quite charming and quaint.
My concern was NEVER about overloading google. My concern was about
Google auto-blocking or throwing a captcha at very high volume and
Dianne Skoll skrev den 2018-02-21 16:37:
We do a HEAD request and it works on most URL shorteners.
The concern voiced in another email about overloading Google's
infrastructure is quite charming and quaint.
+1
some with icla could add this to spamasssassin with
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:38:53 -0700
"@lbutlr" wrote:
> As I suspected, it is possible to get the goo.gl target URL without
> loading the site, though using curl is probably not realistic in this
> specific case.
We do a HEAD request and it works on most URL shorteners.
The