Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-10-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, Matus UHLAR

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-25 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, Matus UHLAR

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-25 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. On 23.09.21 22:07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. RAZOR, PYZOR and DCC often hit on

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I don't think it's reasonable but an FP in Pyzor is leading to other rule hits. Was the overall email marked as spam? On 9/24/2021 12:21 AM, Jared Hall wrote: On 9/23/2021 10:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. No doubt.  The 4.608 points for a single

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-23 Thread Henrik K
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 04:24:38PM -0400, Jared Hall wrote: > Got a remote sender sending some pictures of property damage to be fixed.  > It's > all images.  The only text is: > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the >

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-23 Thread Jared Hall
On 9/23/2021 10:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. No doubt.  The 4.608 points for a single aberration seems reasonable. -- Jared Hall

Re: FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-23 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief! It does not appear that the actual rule matches the spirit of the rule. Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor. -- Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@apache.org Member, Apache Software Foundation

FSL_BULK_SIG in 72_active.cf

2021-09-23 Thread Jared Hall
Got a remote sender sending some pictures of property damage to be fixed.  It's all images.  The only text is: Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone It hits Pyzor for some reason.  Get a PYZOR_CHECK=1.985.  Must've picked the wrong checksum, chief!