Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like it has been sent by this mailinglist. -- best regards Arvid Ephraim Picciani --- Begin Message --- Attn: webmail Subscriber: This mail is to inform all our webmail Subscriber that would will be upgrading our site i

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Justin Mason
Arvid Ephraim Picciani writes: > maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like > it has been sent by this mailinglist. yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through. I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's spam, though ;)

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.08.08 13:16, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like > it has been sent by this mailinglist. yes, it was. I wonder if someone bounces it here or if it was really directed here... Content-Description: "WEB-MAILTEAMS" <[EMA

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like it has been sent by this mailinglist. yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through. I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's spam, though ;) ROFL ... SA list, of all p

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Greg Troxel
I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's spam, though ;) Unfortunately it didn't score that high: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=1.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many points t

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Richard Frovarp
Greg Troxel wrote: Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many points that my MTA rejects them (score > 10). I'd like to not do that, since it seems rude to the list (although ezmlm seems to not really care). I'm guessing that I need a custom rule to assign negative poin

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Greg Troxel wrote: Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many points that my MTA rejects them (score > 10). I looked on the wiki, and haven't found pre-cooked rules for this. Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a whitelist_fro

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread Larry Nedry
On 8/15/08 at 8:07 AM -0700 John Hardin wrote: >Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a >whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_rcvd for the list? Would you really want to auto-train your bayes with mail from this list? Nedry

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-15 Thread James Wilkinson
John Hardin wrote: > Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a > whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_rcvd for the list? Larry Nedry wrote: > Would you really want to auto-train your bayes with mail from this list? The whitelist rules are ignored when SpamAssassin decides whether

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-18 Thread mouss
Justin Mason wrote: Arvid Ephraim Picciani writes: maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like it has been sent by this mailinglist. yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through. I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it'

Re: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber

2008-08-18 Thread Justin Mason
mouss writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > > Arvid Ephraim Picciani writes: > >> maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks > >> like > >> it has been sent by this mailinglist. > > > > yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through. > > > > I assume subscr