On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:07 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> FYI, abuse@ is specified in RFC2142, and need not be explicitly listed
> in the whois.
Thanks. I knew it was somewhere :-)
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> Thusfar 18 reports to abuse@
> (despite the fact it's missing from the rdns whois)
FYI, abuse@ is specified in RFC2142, and need not be explicitly listed
in the whois.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
My figures for date the UK in the last 72 hours: 118 mails
*all* HABEAS accredited.
==
CHECKING DNSBL WHITE LISTS
==
80.75.69.201
NOT WHITELISTED:
sa-other.bondedsender.org, resl.emailreg.org, plus.bondedsender.org,
ips.whitelisted.org
WHITELISTED:
