Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I just got a report of ham blocked with the following rules. This is a
repeated ham report for TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 and thinking of setting its
score to zero. Is there any recommendations on how to handle any of
these rules?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.692 tag=-999 tag2=5
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:56 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: SpamAssassin
> Subject: RE: Handling blocked ham
>
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 19:43 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > If its just one sender, just whitelist them.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 19:43 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> If its just one sender, just whitelist them.
>
> Those rules below do indicate that that email may be coming from a
> 'permission[sic] based email marketing' company.
>
Sorry, hit send to quickly on that last message...
elasmtp-junco
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 19:43 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> If its just one sender, just whitelist them.
>
> Those rules below do indicate that that email may be coming from a
> 'permission[sic] based email marketing' company.
>
elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net
--
Robert
ed seminar tickets
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:56 PM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Handling blocked ham
>
>
> I just got a report of ham blocked with the following rules.
&
I just got a report of ham blocked with the following rules. This is a
repeated ham report for TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 and thinking of setting its
score to zero. Is there any recommendations on how to handle any of
these rules?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.692 tag=-999 tag2=5 kill=5
tests=[DNS_F
