On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:16 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>
> > I'm focusing into mail attachment, those nothing-better-to-do users that
> > sends images to his friends using their corporate email.
>
> Ah, corporate policy enforcement.
>
> I wou
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
I'm focusing into mail attachment, those nothing-better-to-do users that
sends images to his friends using their corporate email.
Ah, corporate policy enforcement.
I wouldn't worry so much about trying to intelligently identify images to
fi
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:36 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> Yes,
>
> but linked is detected over other solutions related to websurfing.
>
> I'm focusing into mail attachment, those nothing-better-to-do users that
> sends
> images to his friends using their corporate email.
Whoops, wro
Yes,
but linked is detected over other solutions related to websurfing.
I'm focusing into mail attachment, those nothing-better-to-do users that sends
images to his friends using their corporate email.
Even, this could be combined with other modules that let SA download image and
then analize
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:19:24 -0600
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>
> Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns
> with noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and
> then run hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After
> detectin these, a gr
-Original Message-
From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 9:19 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hopfield nerons for porn image detection
Good one,
Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>
> Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns
> with noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and
> then run hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After
> detectin these, a grade could be done.
Unfortunately,
Good one,
Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns with
noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and then run
hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After detectin these, a grade
could be done.
Any comment.
On Sunday 01 March 2009 18:49
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:35:35 +0100:
> Please excuse my ignorance -- how fast is that? Also, there's quite a
> difference between identifying an "A" symbol and porn, isn't it?
Depends on how well the bodies form the alphabet ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:19 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> HI all,
>
> While studing a subject of hopfield for my master. Reading, I got that a
> Hopfield network is able to detect patterns even if inputs have noise. So
> for
> example many people could write A capital in many ways
HI all,
While studing a subject of hopfield for my master. Reading, I got that a
Hopfield network is able to detect patterns even if inputs have noise. So for
example many people could write A capital in many ways and hopfield network
will detect A symbol.
What do you think on using this to
11 matches
Mail list logo
