Martin Strand wrote:
It's fine for scoring against, but blocking is insanity!
I tested SpamCop for our info@ address at work (about 200 messages a
day) and didn't get a single FP for six months.
I use it for blocking on our mailserver now (about 2000 accounts) and
haven't received any compl
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:51:50 +0200, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_c
John Rudd wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ha
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham for
my tastes,
tor, but not always a deciding factor.
>
>
> --
> Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
> Austin Energy
> http://www.austinenergy.com
>
>
I just enabled bayes and awl a few days ago after getting a lot of useless
spam.
--
View this message in context:
ht
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:44 -0700, Peter Pluta wrote:
> I see, I still get 5-6 spams per day or so, but I have bayes and auto white
> listing enabled. The DB so far has 2 hams and 14 spams recorded. I wonder
> how long it will take to see some good results from bayes and awl.
Bayes is ignored unt
fits the "spam" characteristcs from bayes?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11126246
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham
for my tastes, and I never fou
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been lo
Peter Pluta wrote:
Thanks, I got these.
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is contained within zen.spamhaus.org. Therefore you
are doing an extra, unnec
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been lo
Quoting Peter Pluta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
> enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
> of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools s
lot of processing)
>
> --
> Please to meet you, Rose. Now run for your life!
>
>
>
>
Thanks, I got these.
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
--
View this mes
On 10-Jun-2007, at 15:21, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's all
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's all you need to know
--
Like the moment when
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been lo
does RBL checks, you can configure MS not to do it and let SA run them
> (with the
> difference than in MS you choose the RBL list, SA has a standard list).
> --
> René Berber
>
>
>
I have skip_rbl_checks 0 set in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11049859
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Peter,
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can
> I enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the
> lack of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools spam database checker. I haven't been
Peter Pluta wrote:
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
> enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
> of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools spam database checker. I
;t been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11046193
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
20 matches
Mail list logo