On 2021-03-13 21:08, RW wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but
insufficiently trained...
It doesn't.
it could be added so when its not trained show its needs more data
meta BAYES_NOT_TRAINED (!BAYE
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but
> insufficiently trained...
It doesn't.
Are there any BAYES hits on their messages, ham or spam? BAYES_{not
50} would be a positive confirmation. I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50
hits when bayes is enabled but insufficiently trained...
In one email, I'm seeing this:
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all users on
a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include "bayes_path" and
"bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about permissions being wrong
from debian-spamd in m
I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all
users on a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include
"bayes_path" and "bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about
permissions being wrong from debian-spamd in mail.log.
But rather than guessing, I'm won
