Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Valdes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 5:12 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ImageInfo vs FuzzyOCR performance?
SPAM Results:
3936 Message(s) 49.83%
19.399 Average Score
--On Friday, October 27, 2006 6:29 AM -0700 Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone have any recent feedback about the performance of
ImageInfo versus FuzzyOCR about detecting stock image spams (or
any others)? Does FuzzyOCR catch significantly more spams than
ImageInfo?
The last I
Jeff Chan wrote:
Does anyone have any recent feedback about the performance of
ImageInfo versus FuzzyOCR about detecting stock image spams (or
any others)? Does FuzzyOCR catch significantly more spams than
ImageInfo?
Cheers,
Jeff C.
I maybe biased, as I help in FuzzyOcr development, but do
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Valdes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 5:12 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ImageInfo vs FuzzyOCR performance?
SPAM Results:
3936 Message(s) 49.83%
19.399 Average Score
3343 Time(s
Jeff Chan wrote:
Does anyone have any recent feedback about the performance of
ImageInfo versus FuzzyOCR about detecting stock image spams (or
any others)? Does FuzzyOCR catch significantly more spams than
ImageInfo?
But one of the things that ImageInfo does to avoid FPs is assign a higher
