On 16.10.18 18:42, RW wrote:
Bayes might work, but I wouldn't like to see it added to body text
because corrupted text could look like obfuscation.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
it should be pushed back to body text just for filters like bayes.
The same could/should be do
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
IC is an effort to dig a hole in the water, because the problem of image spam
with obfuscated text cannot be solved by ocr.
My approach is a "better safe than sorry" best practice that anyone can
implement with existing software:
1. do not displ
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 16.10.18 18:42, RW wrote:
Bayes might work, but I wouldn't like to see it added to body text
because corrupted text could look like obfuscation.
it should be pushed back to body text just for filters like bayes.
The same could/should be do
>On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
>> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
>> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze
>> text contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer
>> FuzzyOCR to feed the OCR'ed text back to SA for
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:21:33AM +0700, Olivier wrote:
>
> That is the way I meant it, it's an AND, not an OR. I see FuzzyOCR as
> just one more tool that can be added to SA.
The problem is it's so inefficient.. I've never seen image spam as a
problem, mostly it hits other rules and MTA blocks
I see a vps and an ".expert" tld sender domain. My servers handle those with a
REJECT rule.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 15:11, Brent Clark wrote:
> Good day Guys
>
> I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
> direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
>
> What I did was configur
My comments on
http://pralab.diee.unica.it/en/ImageCerberus
IC is an effort to dig a hole in the water, because the problem of image spam
with obfuscated text cannot be solved by ocr.
My approach is a "better safe than sorry" best practice that anyone can
implement with existing software:
1.
Hi,
>
> > One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> > independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
> > contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
> > the OCR'ed text back to SA for further analysis (the way pdfAssassin
>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:48:34 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
> >> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> >> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze
> >> text contents: SpamAssassin itself
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
the OCR'ed text back to SA for further ana
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700
Olivier wrote:
> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
> contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
> the OCR'ed text back to SA for fur
Olivier,
Thank you *ever* so much for replying.
Regards
Brent
On 2018/10/16 06:49, Olivier wrote:
Brent,
I have Fuzzy OCR installed and running, but the only rule that was
trigered 22 times during the past 40 days was FUZZY_OCR_WRONG_CTYPE,
meaning that the image type does not match the conten
Brent,
I have Fuzzy OCR installed and running, but the only rule that was
trigered 22 times during the past 40 days was FUZZY_OCR_WRONG_CTYPE,
meaning that the image type does not match the content-type set for
MIME.
That is still a valid catch, but not based on the OCR'ed text.
One of my holdb
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Brent Clark wrote:
Good day Guys
I was fortunate that someone privately emailed me, but is there no one else,
that has any thing they can share (its not only to me, but the community as a
whole). Im sure there is others out there, whose users dealing with this
nonsense.
Good day Guys
I was fortunate that someone privately emailed me, but is there no one
else, that has any thing they can share (its not only to me, but the
community as a whole). Im sure there is others out there, whose users
dealing with this nonsense.
Please share.
Regards
Brent
On 2018/10
Apologies for the subject.
It was meant to read "Is fuzzyocr i.e. Image scanning, warranted in 2018"
Regards
Brent
On 2018/10/12 15:11, Brent Clark wrote:
Good day Guys
I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
What
Good day Guys
I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
What I did was configure vagrant to install spamassassin and fuzzyocr,
and fuzzyocr does not appear to be catching my spam (The example
provided work).
Before I go down the
17 matches
Mail list logo
