Re: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

2005-07-09 Thread Dr Robert Young
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 2005 July, 09, Saturday 05:06 Subject: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4 I just upgraded a box that had a "broken" Sa 2.63 to SA 3.0.4 I noticed the following in the maillog...is this normal for a very "low" activity system. The "no acti

Re: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

2005-07-09 Thread jdow
That, sir, appears to be a problem with your milter or sendmail config. What does that second entry mean to you? {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Dr Robert Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 2005 July, 09, Saturday 05:06 Subject: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4 > I

Re: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

2005-07-09 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Dr Robert Young wrote on Sat, 9 Jul 2005 08:06:45 -0400: > Jul 9 07:12:20 email2 sendmail[1175]: j69BCKK8001175: Milter: no > active filter > Jul 9 07:12:20 email2 sendmail[1175]: j69BCKK8001175: > gorilla.jungle.com [38.151.210.157] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN > during connection to M

Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

2005-07-09 Thread Dr Robert Young
I just upgraded a box that had a "broken" Sa 2.63 to SA 3.0.4 I noticed the following in the maillog...is this normal for a very "low" activity system. The "no active filter" has me worried. Using spamassassin and spamc to send in the "sample" emails" showed them to be working, but that does