On 10/26/2018 3:13 PM, John wrote:
> I just got an email from a mailing list of which i am a member (UK
> academic geophysics) which was scored at 5, mainly from a 5.5
> contribution from KAM_BACK, described as background check SPAM. I have
> not managed to work out what that rule is trying to
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:29:24 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 26 Oct 2018, at 15:13, John wrote:
>
> > I just got an email from a mailing list of which i am a member (UK
> > academic geophysics) which was scored at 5, mainly from a 5.5
> > contribution from KAM_BACK, described as background check
On 26 Oct 2018, at 15:13, John wrote:
I just got an email from a mailing list of which i am a member (UK
academic geophysics) which was scored at 5, mainly from a 5.5
contribution from KAM_BACK, described as background check SPAM. I
have
not managed to work out what that rule is trying to
I just got an email from a mailing list of which i am a member (UK
academic geophysics) which was scored at 5, mainly from a 5.5
contribution from KAM_BACK, described as background check SPAM. I have
not managed to work out what that rule is trying to do, but it is the
first detected oh-nasty
