Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-07 Thread mouss
Evan Platt a écrit : > I'm getting quite a bit of spam with > Return-Path: <> > in the headers. > > Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, it > appears to all be bounce warnings. > > If so, what's the best way to just blackhole this? I have postfix, and put > /Retur

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-06 Thread List Mail User
>... >I'm getting quite a bit of spam with >Return-Path: <> >in the headers. > >Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, >it appears to all be bounce warnings. > >If so, what's the best way to just blackhole this? I have postfix, and put >/Return-Path: <>/ Reject

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-05 Thread Matt Kettler
Evan Platt wrote: > At 12:23 PM 1/5/2006, you wrote: > >> Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email.. >> >> For example, if you accidentally sent mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> you'd get a >> bounce back, and you'd probably want to know about it. > > > Ok, I should have clarified.. There's a

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm getting quite a bit of spam with > Return-Path: <> > in the headers. > > Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Yes, bounces. > Searching my previous mail, it appears to all be bounce warnings. Yes, legitimate mail > If so, what's the best way to jus

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-05 Thread Evan Platt
At 12:23 PM 1/5/2006, you wrote: Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email.. For example, if you accidentally sent mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" you'd get a bounce back, and you'd probably want to know about it. Ok, I should have clarified.. There's a FEW I'm seeing with the null return p

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-05 Thread Matt Kettler
Evan Platt wrote: > I'm getting quite a bit of spam with > Return-Path: <> > in the headers. > > Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, it > appears to all be bounce warnings. Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email.. For example, if you accidentally sent mai

Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

2006-01-05 Thread Evan Platt
I'm getting quite a bit of spam with Return-Path: <> in the headers. Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, it appears to all be bounce warnings. If so, what's the best way to just blackhole this? I have postfix, and put /Return-Path: <>/ Reject in the header_che