On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 07:41:50 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> > I've enclosed one of the messages received here:
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/9Bmu3pj1
>
> I added this to the 60_whitelist_auth.cf to trust this sender:
>
> def_whitelist_auth
On 08/04/18 13:41, David Jones wrote:
On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what is the cause of this - notification emails
from The Pension Regulator in UK (a government body overseeing
pensions) have the destination email in upper case as part of the
On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what is the cause of this - notification emails
from The Pension Regulator in UK (a government body overseeing pensions)
have the destination email in upper case as part of the Message-ID. I
don't know if the user has input
On 07/04/18 21:20, Bill Cole wrote:
On 7 Apr 2018, at 11:42 (-0400), Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Do the standards really require a message id to be in all lower case?
Of course not, and that's also not an accurate description of
MSGID_SPAM_CAPS.
A small minority of rules in SA are based on
On 07/04/18 17:22, Antony Stone wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2018 at 18:10:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 07/04/18 16:52, Reindl Harald wrote something.
Thank you for answering, but really, in effect you haven't answered at
all my question.
And the way I customise the scores are based on
On 07/04/18 17:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.04.2018 um 18:10 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
And the way I customise the scores are based on the type of emails
received at this particular site. It might seem "idiotic" to you, but
there are reasons for those scores. Not everyone receives the same
On 7 Apr 2018, at 11:42 (-0400), Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Do the standards really require a message id to be in all lower case?
Of course not, and that's also not an accurate description of
MSGID_SPAM_CAPS.
A small minority of rules in SA are based on any external standard. They
are
On Saturday 07 April 2018 at 18:10:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 07/04/18 16:52, Reindl Harald wrote something.
> Thank you for answering, but really, in effect you haven't answered at
> all my question.
> And the way I customise the scores are based on the type of emails
> received at this
On 07/04/18 16:52, Reindl Harald wrote:
Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 4.0 required)
who did set the *non default* required score to 4.0?
why did the person not adjust -0.2 for BAYES_00 too?
the scoring of this system is idiotic!
required score here is 5.5 and BAYES_00 is scored to
I'm not entirely sure what is the cause of this - notification emails
from The Pension Regulator in UK (a government body overseeing pensions)
have the destination email in upper case as part of the Message-ID. I
don't know if the user has input their email address in caps when
creating the
10 matches
Mail list logo
