Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-14 Thread mouss
Mário Gamito wrote: Hi, now, take one of the messages and run spamassassin -t on it and show these tests (at the end of the report). Strange, it has only 4.1 points, but is marked as SPAM! not now, but it was marked as spam when it was delivered. maybe dcc/razor (or spamcops?)

Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi, My boss is getting HAM mails from two addresses which are always marked as SPAM. I've seen that lowering the sa-learn threshold is not an option. Is there a way to configure SA to stop marking those two specific addresses as SPAM ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards -- :wq!

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread Matthias Häker
Mário Gamito schrieb: Hi, My boss is getting HAM mails from two addresses which are always marked as SPAM. I've seen that lowering the sa-learn threshold is not an option. Is there a way to configure SA to stop marking those two specific addresses as SPAM ? Any help would be appreciated.

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread John D. Hardin
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Mário Gamito wrote: My boss is getting HAM mails from two addresses which are always marked as SPAM. Is there a way to configure SA to stop marking those two specific addresses as SPAM ? Look at the config documentation for the whitelist_from_rcvd and

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi, Thank you for your answers. Look at the config documentation for the whitelist_from_rcvd and whitelist_from_spf options. Humm... where are they ? Couldn't find it :( Can you post the list of rules that these mails are hitting (the X-Spam_Status header)? Here it is: X-Spam-Status:

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread John D. Hardin
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Mário Gamito wrote: Look at the config documentation for the whitelist_from_rcvd and whitelist_from_spf options. Humm... where are they ? Couldn't find it :( perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF or

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread John Rudd
Are you using the Botnet plugin? If so, I'd add an exemption for their IP address to your Botnet.cf file. It looks like what you'd need, if you are using Botnet, is either: botnet_skip_ip^81\.92\.203\.3$ and/or botnet_skip_ip^84\.18\.242\.136$ Depending on whether your

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread mouss
Mário Gamito wrote: Hi, Thank you for your answers. Look at the config documentation for the whitelist_from_rcvd and whitelist_from_spf options. Humm... where are they ? Couldn't find it :( Can you post the list of rules that these mails are hitting (the X-Spam_Status header)?

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

2007-04-13 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi, now, take one of the messages and run spamassassin -t on it and show these tests (at the end of the report). Strange, it has only 4.1 points, but is marked as SPAM! # spamassassin -t 1173748887.M111529P3626V0901I0172197A_86.mail.telbit.pt\,S\=28719\:2\, Content analysis