Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be available
in a returned message?
Anyone? Or am I stuck maintaining duplicate (or worse) sets of rules
with (almost) the same regex for mimeheader, rawbody, ...
I'm a bit surprised rawbody fails; IIRC it use
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
I have yet to figure out why people think it's a good idea to relay
mail from your domain host to your ISP account (especially when the two are
different companies)
Do not mistake the following statement for any form of approval :)
To many
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 14.04.10 16:16, Kris Deugau wrote:
... In other words, keep track of all of the third-party hosting systems
our customers insist on forwarding their domain mail to their ISP
account (ie, us) from?
Not practical.
requiring your users to send mail through yo
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> i get NO backscatter here.
>> case study for one of our clients, they got 50,000 spams a month
>> (normally). they got joe jobbed. they started to get 5MM a month.
>> (with no increase in backscatter reaching users. In fact, the client
>> never knew.. until the
Michael Scheidell wrote:
i get NO backscatter here.
case study for one of our clients, they got 50,000 spams a month
(normally). they got joe jobbed. they started to get 5MM a month.
(with no increase in backscatter reaching users. In fact, the client
never knew.. until the next month when h
On 4/14/10 3:57 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
yes, but they are disabled unless you have specific whitelists. the
'original-message content' you are looking for.
vbounce rules are disabled, even if you enable them unless you also
have this in *.cf
whitelist_bounce_relays
Matt Garretson wrote:
Despite conventional wisdom to the contrary, I have been training Bayes
on bounces (both spam and ham) for years with at least semi-decent
results when it comes to backscatter. That'd be one potential way to get
at the original content (when it's available). But I'd advise a
Michael Scheidell wrote:
yes, but they are disabled unless you have specific whitelists. the
'original-message content' you are looking for.
vbounce rules are disabled, even if you enable them unless you also have
this in *.cf
whitelist_bounce_relays {your outbound mail servers}
As I sai
On 4/14/2010 2:23 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to match on that original-message content - after
> all, that's the real spam payload; the rest of the message is perfectly
> legitimate.
Despite conventional wisdom to the contrary, I have been training Bayes
on bounces (both sp
On 4/14/10 2:23 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/14/10 12:21 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be
available in a returned message?
use the vbounce rules. google for sa and vbounce. its already done
if you are using a newer
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/14/10 12:21 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be available
in a returned message?
use the vbounce rules. google for sa and vbounce. its already done if
you are using a newer version of SA.
you need to specifically
Quoting Michael Scheidell :
On 4/14/10 12:21 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be
available in a returned message?
use the vbounce rules. google for sa and vbounce. its already done
if you are using a newer version of SA.
you need to specifi
On 4/14/10 12:21 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be available
in a returned message?
use the vbounce rules. google for sa and vbounce. its already done if
you are using a newer version of SA.
you need to specifically whitelist the outbound mai
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be available
in a returned message?
I've got one customer reporting backscatter spam, and while I've been
able to create a number of rules that usually hit, they tend to fail on
NDRs that are not "properly" formatted (eg, complete or
h
14 matches
Mail list logo