Need a little help for MySQL users.
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes SA to hang until it
At 06:30 16-05-2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in
a manner that basically causes SA to hang until
Marc Perkel wrote:
Need a little help for MySQL users.
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes
SM wrote:
At 06:30 16-05-2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes SA to
Hi Mark,
At 09:15 16-05-2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - I'm trying that. So innodb is better?
InnoDB supports transactions. The entire table is not locked as with
MyISAM when data is inserted, updated or deleted. That's better in
the case of a Bayes database. In general, there is a
