Re[2]: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Joe, Tuesday, April 26, 2005, 8:31:43 AM, you wrote: JK On another server or two I have disabled the auto white-list. Is JK this acceptable practice? Now that I am into this I recall seeing JK this issue before and thus decided to disable it. Comments on this JK practice? My personal

Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Joe Kletch
Reference header text below 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list why is something in the auto whitelist scoring positive? Shouldn't this be adding negative points? Thanks, Joe Kletch --- X-AOL-IP: 205.188.162.5 X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Breakfast menu card X-Spam-Flag: YES

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Yackley
Joe Kletch said: Reference header text below 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list why is something in the auto whitelist scoring positive? Shouldn't this be adding negative points? Thanks, Joe Kletch * 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Hi Joe, Check out

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Joe Kletch wrote: Reference header text below 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list why is something in the auto whitelist scoring positive? Shouldn't this be adding negative points? First, despite it's name the AWL's behavior is NOT limited to being a whitelist. It's a score

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Joe Kletch
On Apr 26, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Matt Yackley wrote: * 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Hi Joe, Check out http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay Thanks--that makes sense. Fighting false positives for a high-strung sales organization is quite a challenge these days.

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Matt Yackley wrote: J --matt gonna see if I can post this faster than Matt K. Damnit!! You beat me to a post in my favorite topic :)

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Joe Kletch
On Apr 26, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: Joe Kletch wrote: Reference header text below 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list why is something in the auto whitelist scoring positive? Shouldn't this be adding negative points? First, despite it's name the AWL's behavior is NOT

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Joe Kletch
On Apr 26, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Matt Yackley wrote: Joe Kletch said: Reference header text below 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list why is something in the auto whitelist scoring positive? Shouldn't this be adding negative points? Thanks, Joe Kletch * 3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Joe Kletch wrote: On Apr 26, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: Off color Jokes are rampant in this organization from the CEO down. I'm sure the auto-learn dbs are quite confused. I'll probably raise the threshold and keep requesting header of FPs. Really, off-color jokes shouldn't

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Andy Jezierski
Joe Kletch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 10:31:43 AM: [snip] On another server or two I have disabled the auto white-list. Is this acceptable practice? Now that I am into this I recall seeing this issue before and thus decided to disable it. Comments on this practice? Joe

Re: Need help interpretting score

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Joe Kletch wrote: Thinking I should check the auto white-list I looked for the tools on my FreeBSD 5.3 box running SA 3.02 and no tools exist. Nothing in the ports tree--so I loaded the RPM port and then set to load the RPM Package, however it complained about a bunch of missing dependencies