Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I have noticed that spam tracks current events.
We've had a run of spam recently with a teaser subject that Megyn Kelly
might q uit Fox news. That's a little less than current!
Joseph Brennan
Where I sit this is done by feeding spamtraps to Bayes.
No need to name it something fancy.
It's been working for over a decade and will keep on feeding my 30GB
Bayes/Redis DB.
On 01/26/2018 08:49 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I've been doing some sociological analysis of the spam I'
On 01/26/2018 01:49 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I've been doing some sociological analysis of the spam I've been
getting on my honeypot, Bays feeder email boxes (dangerous, I know)
and I've come up with what I think MIGHT be a way to fight spam
that I wanted to run up the flagpole.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:49:07 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip]
> Do you think this approach might work?
Not any better than Bayes. All your "spam archetype" examples are
already easy to stop; we whack them all handily with Bayes. The
annoying ones are more like:
Subject: hi
Subject: 'sup
Hi All,
OK I've been doing some sociological analysis of the spam I've been
getting on my honeypot, Bays feeder email boxes (dangerous, I know)
and I've come up with what I think MIGHT be a way to fight spam
that I wanted to run up the flagpole.
We all know ONE basic thing about spam:
Spammer
