Well I'm not sure about new but the image spam seems to be back on again
after a long absence:
http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09
Same issues/filtering techniques as before.
These do seem to be doing a pretty good job of clobbering Bayes filtering
though.
Chris
Hi,
Well I'm not sure about new but the image spam seems to be back on again
after a long absence:
http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09
Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules? I haven't seen some
of these before:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50,
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Alex wrote:
Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules?
Nothing magical but I'll send you a response offlist.
Why is your score 6.0?
Not my score. It is a customer's score. They can set them at anything they
want (well anything 3 and above).
Chris
I'm sure I'm not the first to see them but I hadn't seen a post here.
The pharma image spams are back after a long break:
http://pastebin.com/mb1876f6
Like the others they are fairly easily blocked but just thought I'd
pass on what I'd seen.
Chris
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:38:19 -0500
Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the first to see them but I hadn't seen a post
here. The pharma image spams are back after a long break:
http://pastebin.com/mb1876f6
Like the others they are fairly easily blocked but just thought
