Hi all,
Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers :
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none]
Is it normal ? How can I make these spams tested ?
Thanks.
--
Emmanuel Lesouef
DSI | CRBN
t: 0231069671
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
At 08:01 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers :
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none]
Is it normal ? How can I make these spams tested ?
It's not normal. Upload a sample of the spam includ
Le Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:19:06 -0800,
SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
> At 08:01 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> >Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers :
> >
> >X-Spam-Score: 0
> >X-Spam-Level:
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none]
> >
> >Is it normal
At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
The message hits RDNS_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE, URIBL_WS_SURBL,
URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_BLACK,
URIBL_RHS_DOB. The total score is 12.6.
Are you using SURBL ( http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassi
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:40 -0800, SM wrote:
> At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
>
> >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and
that X-Spam-Status is missing autolearn and version. Whatever calls SA,
you want to check with that.
Le Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:40:30 -0800,
SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
>
> >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
>
> The message hits RDNS_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE, URIBL_WS_SURBL,
> URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_BLACK,
> URIBL_RHS_DOB. T
Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100,
Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:40 -0800, SM wrote:
> > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> >
> > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
>
> That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and
>
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100,
> Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
> >
> > That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Versio
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100,
Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m61564e4
That's not a d