No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Hi all, Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers : X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] Is it normal ? How can I make these spams tested ? Thanks. -- Emmanuel Lesouef DSI | CRBN t: 0231069671 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-20 Thread SM
Hi, At 08:01 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers : X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] Is it normal ? How can I make these spams tested ? It's not normal. Upload a sample of the spam includ

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Le Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:19:06 -0800, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi, > At 08:01 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > >Nowadays, I get more and more spam that get these headers : > > > >X-Spam-Score: 0 > >X-Spam-Level: > >X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] > > > >Is it normal

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-20 Thread SM
At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 The message hits RDNS_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE, URIBL_WS_SURBL, URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_BLACK, URIBL_RHS_DOB. The total score is 12.6. Are you using SURBL ( http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassi

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-20 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:40 -0800, SM wrote: > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and that X-Spam-Status is missing autolearn and version. Whatever calls SA, you want to check with that.

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-21 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Le Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:40:30 -0800, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 > > The message hits RDNS_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE, URIBL_WS_SURBL, > URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_BLACK, > URIBL_RHS_DOB. T

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-21 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:40 -0800, SM wrote: > > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 > > That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and >

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100, > Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 > > > > That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Versio

Re: No scoring because of not beeing tested ?

2008-02-22 Thread mouss
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 That's not a d