Not scoring high enough on this spam...

2008-03-28 Thread Andrew Hearn
http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew

Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

2008-03-28 Thread Richard Frovarp
Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew pts rule name description --

Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

2008-03-28 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew If you learn the message which = 3.5 wouldn't that put the score +5?

Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

2008-03-28 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? span name=3D#rwpt/spanpbr/pa name=3D#twtw/a I have some stupid