Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said:
why not set your hostname to an fqdn value?
Because then well-behaved tools will be messed up?
You probably mean broken resolver implementations. but these should
either be fixed or abandoned. It's been years
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said:
Mike Pepe wrote:
Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
an inkling as to what I could do.
Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
(reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname m
On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said:
> Mike Pepe wrote:
>> Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
>> an inkling as to what I could do.
>>
>> Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
>>
>> (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must conta
Mike Pepe wrote:
Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
an inkling as to what I could do.
Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
(reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.)
I checked and sure enough, the HELO just spits out
Mike Pepe wrote:
> Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
> an inkling as to what I could do.
>
> Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
>
> (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.)
>
> I checked and sure enough, the HELO ju
Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
an inkling as to what I could do.
Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
(reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.)
I checked and sure enough, the HELO just spits out the hostname, not
