On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:28:27PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> btw, I think this is already possible using the shortcircuit plugin.
> Just use rule priorities to run the non-net rules first, and
> shortcircuit if they are sufficient.
Currently DNS queries are sent no matter what, but it's fixabl
btw, I think this is already possible using the shortcircuit plugin.
Just use rule priorities to run the non-net rules first, and
shortcircuit if they are sufficient.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:05, Henrik K wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:23:00AM -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> On 10/
On 30/10/2010 4:28 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
rsync? to check mail?
Hrm, not a bad idea for the basis of a bayesian filter.
Daryl
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:28:09 +0200
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-10-30 9:56, RW wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
> > dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
> >> internet from not running unnecessary tests o
On 2010-10-30 9:56, RW wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
internet from not running unnecessary tests on every instance of
spamassassin seems worth doing.
You are also wasting resources by
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
> internet from not running unnecessary tests on every instance of
> spamassassin seems worth doing.
You are also wasting resources by putting the round-trips on
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:23:00AM -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 10/30, Michael Parker wrote:
> > > I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> > > affect the outcome.
> >
> > Why?
>
> To reduce the network load on my server which is one of the hosts of the
>
On 10/30, Michael Parker wrote:
> > I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> > affect the outcome.
>
> Why?
To reduce the network load on my server which is one of the hosts of the
DNSWL.org list?
> Assuming a reasonably fast connection network checks are basically f
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:42 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> affect the outcome.
Why?
Assuming a reasonably fast connection network checks are basically free.
They are kicked off at the start of a scan and the results are co
I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
affect the outcome.
For example, if you run all non-network tests, and at that point an email's
score qualifies as spam, and then you run all the non-spam network tests
(hitting whitelists), and it still qualifies as spam, there's
10 matches
Mail list logo
