On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
"John R. Levine" wrote:
> But outbound filtering is far more useful when it, you know, actually
> works.
Outbound filtering is far trickier than inbound filtering. Unless you
really want to annoy your customers, you have to hold suspect mail
(anything sc
On Oct 29, 2013, at 9:31 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
> "John R. Levine" wrote:
>
>> But outbound filtering is far more useful when it, you know, actually
>> works.
>
> Outbound filtering is far trickier than inbound filtering. Unless you
> really want
On 29 Oct 2013 09:45:02 -0700
"Neil Schwartzman" wrote:
> the difficulty with a rate-limiting approach is the criminals
> reverse-engineer it pretty quickly, and just spread the joy over
> numerous accounts.
True, though that's quite hard. Given a user population of 10K users,
it's pretty easy
