Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Mangiafico
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: >> > It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin, >> > the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering >> > of add_header can be maintained). >> > >> > See: >> >  https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/sho

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-21 Thread Mark Martinec
> > It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin, > > the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering > > of add_header can be maintained). > > > > See: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6254 > > Ah, thank you. I made this change in

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-20 Thread Robert Mangiafico
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > On Thursday 20 May 2010 08:46:25 Per Jessen wrote: >> Per Jessen wrote: >> > Robert Mangiafico wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >> >>> I googled a bit, and found the following: >> >>> Pseudo-hashes have been re

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-20 Thread Mark Martinec
On Thursday 20 May 2010 08:46:25 Per Jessen wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: > > Robert Mangiafico wrote: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: > >>> I googled a bit, and found the following: > >>> Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl, afaict as of 5.1.0. It's > >>> really perl t

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-19 Thread Per Jessen
Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Mangiafico wrote: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >>> >>> I googled a bit, and found the following: >>> Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl, afaict as of 5.1.0.  It's >>> really perl that is complaining, not spamassassin. I don't use >>> p

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-19 Thread Per Jessen
Robert Mangiafico wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> I googled a bit, and found the following: >> Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl, afaict as of 5.1.0.  It's >> really perl that is complaining, not spamassassin. I don't use >> popauth myself and I'm not muc

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-19 Thread Robert Mangiafico
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Mangiafico wrote: > >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico >> wrote: >>> Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're >>> seeing these errors in the logs: >>> >>> spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are de

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-17 Thread Per Jessen
Robert Mangiafico wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico > wrote: >> Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're >> seeing these errors in the logs: >> >> spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at >> /etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line 195, l

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico wrote: > > Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're > > seeing these errors in the logs: > > > > spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line 195, line 54. > > spamd[29369

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-17 Thread Robert Mangiafico
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico wrote: > Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're > seeing these errors in the logs: > > spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at > /etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line 195, line 54. > spamd[29369]: plugin: eva

POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

2010-05-12 Thread Robert Mangiafico
Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're seeing these errors in the logs: spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at /etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line 195, line 54. spamd[29369]: plugin: eval failed: Can't coerce array into hash at /etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAu