From: Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:13:24 -0500, Lindsay Haisley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
away.
I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
away in about 15
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
away.
I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
away in about 15 minutes.
--
Lindsay Haisley |Fighting against human | PGP public key
FMP
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
greps the downloaded file for the string META HTTP-EQUIV, which should
never occur in a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file.
Why not just use sa-update and not deal with
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
use both.
--
Lindsay Haisley | In an open world,| PGP public key
FMP Computer Services |who
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
use both.
sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken. I distantly remember configuring
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
greps the downloaded file for
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories.
I
use both.
sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken. I distantly remember
configuring it to do so.
http://saupdates.openprotect.com/ has instructions for
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:46 -0400, Phil Barnett wrote:
I'm going to try this, but with a 5 minute wait. I run it in the middle of
the
night anyway, who cares how long it takes.
Actually, the proper response might be a random wait.
The HTML that gets sent by SARE is:
HTMLHEADMETA
I have a question regarding this.
I have set up the sa_update channel for the SARE rules and run it.
Everything worked OK BUT, I notice that sa_update is installing the rules
in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007, while rulesdujour was instaling them in
/etc/mail/spamassassin.
Do I need to remove
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
older
rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
Yes.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
I lost my foo. - Theo
pgpgySBNRd9Tg.pgp
On Thursday 28 June 2007 16:39, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
older rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
Yes.
I suspected as much.
Thank you,
--
On Thursday 28 June 2007 17:02, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
I don't know what would be gained by a random wait.
The idea of a random wait for contention resolution is long standing. It's
built into the TCP/IP protocol for example.
For example, say my cron job runs at 3 am. Lot's of them probably
It seems as if the problem HTML redirect page is hiding somewhere when
rules_du_jour gets to its SA lint check, and it doesn't show up until
the rollback is done, so the patch I sent earlier isn't effective. I'll
need to read the code more thoroughly and don't have time now, so here's
a
At 10:52 AM Monday, 6/18/2007, Lindsay Haisley wrote -=
--lint has failed so it'll run properly next time.
cut here
--- /root/rules_du_jour.orig2007-06-17 21:01:24.0 -0500
+++ /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour 2007-06-18
16 matches
Mail list logo
