Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I know those apps are current for my OS, which is essentially
Ubuntu 12.04 (due to be updated soon).
My MTA is postfix but I generally reject or discard through that,
whereas SA delivers most stuff to the junk bin as a final check by me.
I was unaware
Am 20.06.2016 um 22:01 schrieb spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk:
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I am aware the versions are the latest for my OS - Mint Maya
13 is essentially Ubuntu 12.04 - but I will check. In any case I'm due
to update the OS in the near future
Mint?
http://www.infowo
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I am aware the versions are the latest for my OS - Mint Maya
13 is essentially Ubuntu 12.04 - but I will check. In any case I'm due
to update the OS in the near future.
My MTA is postfix but I find it easier to manage rules in SA than in
postfix, which
On 14 Jun 2016, at 11:47, spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
The code below is found in several places online and for some months I
have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up Fail
even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating on
gmail: from known good
And a convenient spam purporting to come from google verifies the second
part of the test. Thanks again. :)
--
Dave Stiles
Thanks for the extra info and advice, RW. Noted. :)
--
Dave Stiles
Thanks, RW. That's stopped it reporting valid gmail. Now I'll have to
wait to see if it reports false gmail. :)
--
Dave Stiles
On 15-06-16 00:13, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>
>
> spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
>> The code below is found in several places online and for some months I
>> have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up Fail
>> even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrati
spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
The code below is found in several places online and for some months I
have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up Fail
even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating on
gmail: from known good contacts I always get NOT
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:17:34 +0100
RW wrote:
> Edit the rules and replace DKIM_VERIFIED with DKIM_VALID_AU.
I would still score these low for a while to make sure there
aren't any FPs. I think all of those organizations are using DMARC
rather than DKIM.
The difference is that under DMARC sub-d
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:55:43 +0100
SA wrote:
> Thanks, RW.
>
> > This can only be hit if DKIM_VERIFIED is not hit. What DKIM result
> > are you seeing?
>
> This is direct from a gmail account with DKIM-Signature set to
> d=gmail.com and Authentication-Results saying dkim=pass. Received-SPF
>
Thanks, RW.
This can only be hit if DKIM_VERIFIED is not hit. What DKIM result are
you seeing?
This is direct from a gmail account with DKIM-Signature set to
d=gmail.com and Authentication-Results saying dkim=pass. Received-SPF
also Pass.
If the email is passed through a third-party netwo
Thanks, Martin. That will take a little more time than I currently have
but I'll certainly try it in a few days' time.
--
Dave Stiles
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:47:54 +0100
spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
> The code below is found in several places online and for some months
> I have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up
> Fail even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating
> on gmail: fro
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:47 +0100, spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
> The code below is found in several places online and for some months
> I have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up
> Fail even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating
> on gmail: from
The code below is found in several places online and for some months I
have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up Fail
even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating on
gmail: from known good contacts I always get NOTVALID_GMAIL (I have
reduced the scores
16 matches
Mail list logo
