On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 15:42 -0500, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> I have one particular user being hammered by porn spam from freemail
> accounts, mostly Yahoo and live.com . These are getting by existing
> rules, including 70_sare_adult_cf .
>
You may find this following approach
>
> I have one particular user being hammered by porn spam from freemail
> accounts, mostly Yahoo and live.com . These are getting by existing
> rules, including 70_sare_adult_cf .
>
> The messages typically have a on-topic, suggestive Subject: line. The body
> is a URL (g
I have one particular user being hammered by porn spam from freemail
accounts, mostly Yahoo and live.com . These are getting by existing
rules, including 70_sare_adult_cf .
The messages typically have a on-topic, suggestive Subject: line. The body
is a URL (google groups or other), and two
> Hello List, I am running SA 2.63, Posfix 2 & Amavisd-new. I have many updated
> rule sets, any rules out there to "see" letters spelled as below?
> Anyone else doing this?
>
> TIA
> Eric
>
Yes, I got a very nice one lately with all the meds in it, with pricing. It
got marked as spam because of th
Hello List, I am running SA 2.63, Posfix 2 & Amavisd-new. I have many updated
rule sets, any rules out there to "see" letters spelled as below?
The following spam got in, just thought I'd share with the list, I have never
seen this technique. My tagged above is set to -100 so I can see the tests
IMHO, 3.x is by far the best and most efficient release to date.
Just follow the doc. It's very easy.
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Polk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11
Hi!
Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
You should follow the docs, there is much mentioned there. Like upgrading
your bayes databases. If you use those...
You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or ins
Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
--
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joe Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Hi!
He's on 2.64 currently.
You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
write
He's on 2.64 currently.
--
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:49:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Porn Spam
> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
> thing i
I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He
> is
> setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but
> nothing
> seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
> coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone ha
Jon,
Can you post the rule for this? I would like to see an example.
TIA,
- Original Message -
From: "Jon McGreevy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Joe Polk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: Porn Spam
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 6:40:54 AM, Joe Polk wrote:
> I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
> setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
> seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
. My system is not catching
most of the messages like that coming in and labeling them. Hope this helps
-Original Message-
From: Joe Polk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:41 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Porn Spam
I have a friend who has seen a
I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there
15 matches
Mail list logo
