On 27.04.13 09:50, Blason rock wrote:
Oh yeah. I rather should have posted my question in zimbra mailing list.
But any way i found the answer; its pretty easy to integrate prerbl with
postfix.
Yes, and it's not SA issue but the MTA's.
However, many users prefer only using SA and not any SMTP-ti
Oh yeah. I rather should have posted my question in zimbra mailing list.
But any way i found the answer; its pretty easy to integrate prerbl with
postfix.
On 27 Apr 2013 07:01, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-04-25 23:19:
>
> Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses
Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-04-25 23:19:
Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses Postfix, what makes you
believe
you need a special Zimbra solution?
is zimbra not just the webui for postfix ? :)
> > Since a couple of years they have something thats called google.
:)
this page coul
Blason rock skrev den 2013-04-25 21:40:
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra?
asking on a diff maillist ?
if you need advice to spamassassin fell free to ask here, if you need
help with postfix, or zimbra ask
Blason rock skrev den 2013-04-25 21:09:
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA?
no this is impposible :)
What i mean is with SA as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA
should check if
the connected host is part of any RBL and then process connection
accordingly.
if you dont
--On Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:19 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
are usrers who might have imp
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
> the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
> are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra,
> are there any?
Color me ignor
>
> Tony
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raym...@prolocation.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:26 PM
> *To:* Blason rock
> *Cc:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
>
> ** **
>
> H
...@prolocation.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:26 PM
To: Blason rock
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/po
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock het volgende
g
So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" wrote:
> Hai!
>
> Grin.
>
> Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
>
> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi folks,
>
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as
> soon as sombody connects on port 25 S
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
13 matches
Mail list logo
