On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 02:07 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2018, at 8:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a lot of SORBS lookups rejected due to an "unexpected
> > RCODE". Is anybody else seeing these?
>
> I'm sure someone is...
>
> There are none of those where I see. If the
On 6 Apr 2018, at 8:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
I'm getting a lot of SORBS lookups rejected due to an "unexpected
RCODE". Is anybody else seeing these?
I'm sure someone is...
There are none of those where I see. If the "unexpected RCODE" is
SERVFAIL, it was likely transient on their end. If
I'm getting a lot of SORBS lookups rejected due to an "unexpected
RCODE". Is anybody else seeing these?
I'm running BIND 9.11.3-RedHat-9.11.3-2.fc27
Martin
On 03.04.11 21:56, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
If you go through the garbage required to register to get to the contents
of this link, you'll see that this IP hits two listings, Escalated
entries, and DUHL entries, both of which are colored green, which it says
means Historical Listings
Figured I'd forward this along, since he can't post to the list due
apparently to this list's use of sorbs. The IP address I got it from was
67.210.225.171.
Interestingly, sorbs' website says it's not actively listed, but their DNS
zone says otherwise.
And their website conveys a general
If you go through the garbage required to register to get to the contents
of this link, you'll see that this IP hits two listings, Escalated
entries, and DUHL entries, both of which are colored green, which it says
means Historical Listings (inactive). But it's still listed:
$ host
