dawa wrote:
Thanks all for the hints they were very helpful !!
@mouss-2: What do you mean with
Here, RCVD_IN_PBL is set to 4.0.
I can't find this option in my config - or do you mean I should increase
this score!??
Yes. but don't listen to me. make sure it's ok for you before changing
th
nd is it ok when after the learning of the spam I activate the bayes
>> autolearn?!
>>
>
> activate Bayes and autolearn now. There is no reason to wait until you
> train it.
>
>> What else can I do to identify obvious mails?!
>
> if you got the mail directly
dawa wrote:
Hello!
System: Debian 4.0
SpamAssassin version: 3.2.2
MTA: Postfix with Amavis and ClamAV
- - - - - - - - - - - -
We have the problem that some very obvious spam mail come through (example:
http://pastebin.com/m606b1420).
it now hits URIBL_BLACK.
Here, RCVD_IN_PBL is set to 4.0.
On Wed, October 1, 2008 16:34, dawa wrote:
> Now I thougt bayes is on (see here the local.cf:
> http://pastebin.com/m55ba168) but I think it didn't work correctly.
add_header all DCC_DCCB_: _DCCR_ change to
add_header all DCC_DCCB _DCCR_
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.serv
ls?!
Thank you for any help!
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-some-obvious-spam-mails-tp19761835p19761835.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
